🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive move to restrict social platforms access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate internationally. Lawmakers, safety advocates, and parents are monitoring with great interest to see if this approach will become a template for other nations.

European Movement

Across Europe, a increasing number of nations are moving toward comparable restrictions.

• Denmark plans a ban on social media for under-15s, with the prime minister stating that phones and platforms are "stealing our youngsters' innocence". Legislation is expected to be enacted in the coming year.
• Norway is set to implement a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to protect children from the "influence of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is developing a digital wallet to authenticate the user details of social media participants. Authorities have indicated that an Australian-model ban could be "an tools in reserve".
• In Spain, the prime minister has asked the legislature to approve a law increasing the access age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has threatened a ban for under-15s, and a legislative committee has endorsed a similar move, alongside an overnight "screen time restriction" for adolescents.
• The government in the Netherlands has advised guardians to restrict their kids from social media up to the age of 15.

Across the European Union, the EU parliament has passed a advisory statement calling for a ban for teenagers under 16 except if parental consent is granted. While it warns of the "habit-forming" design of these platforms, the resolution does not establish enforceable legislation.

"A strong age limit is a good foundation," stated a leading MEP behind the initiative.

The UK: A Watchful Eye

In the UK, the leadership has not ruled out a possible ban, arguing that "no option is being dismissed" but stressing any action must be "based on robust research".

Previously, interest grew behind a proposal to introduce restrictions on social media use by minors, but it was ultimately modified. Nonetheless, the administration vowed to conduct more studies the matter.

Advocacy groups have raised warnings. One foundation established by the family of a girl who was lost after being exposed to harmful platform posts suggests that a strict age ban might not improve online safety and could result in a "dangerous transition" of exposure when young people become eligible.

"Australia's ban is a reaction to the failure of the social media companies to create products and services that are secure and suitable for young users," stated a leading child protection advocate.

America: A Decentralized Picture

Across America, action is primarily occurring at the local level against a backdrop of national gridlock.

• The state of Utah mandates guardian permission for under-18s to use social media and controls late-night use.
• The state of Florida has enacted a measure banning under-14s from accessing social media, though it is subject to legal challenges.
• Virginia has enacted a regulation limiting minors to one hour of social media use per day, with any further access needing adult consent.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have likewise enacted measures requiring parental consent for minors to create social media accounts.

Even with bipartisan support and proposals from certain individuals to follow Australia's lead, a US-wide ban is presently seen as improbable.

Worldwide Views

Apart from the West, other states are similarly considering moves.

• The Malaysian government aims to prohibit social media for those under sixteen effective next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has raised the minimum age for Instagram to 16.

However, international organizations adopt a more nuanced position. Unicef has advised that blanket prohibitions have downsides and "might backfire". The body points out that social networks can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable children and that bans should not be a "excuse" for platform operators to improve child safeguards.

Even as this worldwide conversation unfolds, the actions of this nation and its followers demonstrate that governments internationally are increasingly content to delay for tech companies to act voluntarily.